Friday, May 18, 2012

You are here: Home >

Posts tagged as:

times

The baby dolphin lay on its side, one flipper pointed toward cloudy skies, rocking back and forth with the waves near Innarity Point, FL  
“I looked and saw a baby porpoise, a terrible sight to see,” local resident Chris McCune told WKRG-TV News out of nearby Mobile, AL.
This young dolphin was one of the most recent of at least 138 dolphins that have died in the Gulf this year, nearly half of them premature or newborn calves.
But that’s just the tip of the iceberg, scientists say. Many more dolphins are dying in the Gulf than are officially counted. New research released today shows that the average number for most species may be 50 times higher than what’s reported now, a conservative figure according to the authors.

Dolphins at play near Orange Beach, AL                       Photo by Rocky Kistner/NRDC

That suggests that so far this year, more than 6,500 dolphins may have died, and, according to the report, for some species of mammals, the rate is 250 times higher. As NRDC’s Michael Jasny notes in his blog today, the researchers point out that the media have reported that the BP oil disaster may have modest environmental impacts due to the low numbers of wildlife and mammal mortalities. That is far from the case.

This frightening math makes determining the provenance of the 130 stranded animals all the more urgent.  As I’ve said before, the dolphin communities that have made their homes in the Gulf’s bays, sounds, and estuaries are small and semi-isolated, and the death of even a few babies can have outsized effects on the group.  The shelf and offshore populations are larger but not vast, and the death of hundreds, let alone thousands, of animals would far exceed the government’s estimate of what they can reasonably sustain.  

A NOAA spokeswoman said the agency is looking at the new data, but that it has always pointed out that the true number of dead mammals is much higher than what washes onshore. “We’ve been saying for a long time, a lot of marine mammals die in the ocean that we never will see.”
There are many reasons for this, but mostly because sea mammals this size that die are quickly consumed by other predator fish or sink to the bottom of the ocean. As Michael Jasny explains in a previous blog, determining what caused these deaths is not easy.  The results of a special federal investigation into dolphin deaths could take many months or years.

Determining the cause of death in stranded whales and dolphins can be tricky business, even with a major offshore spill in the backdrop.  We know that oil exposure can upset reproduction in wild mammals, and that dolphins aren’t particularly adept at avoiding sheens and emulsified oil.  On the other hand, the calves might have died of infectious disease, or their mothers’ exposure to unrelated toxins, or any one of a variety of other causes, and their high reported numbers could be an artifact of the intensified monitoring that presumably has followed the spill.

The Gulf will soon witness the return of vacationers and college kids on spring break heading to the beaches, hoping to find some relaxation in the sun after a long winter up north. But for residents who live there, the arrival of spring has brought more confusion and concern. “We can’t seem to get any answers from anybody about anything and that’s very frustrating,” one resident told WKRG-TV
That seems to be the norm these days in the Gulf, from deaths of sea turtles to the safety of the seafood. But many people in the Gulf are certain about one thing: The unfolding of this oil disaster is far from over.




Most Popular Entries on HuffingtonPost

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • LinkedIn

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

After a damning New York Times story accusing General Electric of having paid $0 in American taxes despite $5.2 billion in domestic revenue, the company is fighting back–by Twitter.

In a peculiar gambit, GE’s strategy seems to be to use Twitter –via @GEpublicaffairs, a still uncertified account–to respond to a random assortment of writers at various outlets totally unaffiliated with the New York Times, who just happened to tweet the story at some point.

Recipients of @ replies from the GEpublicaffairs account include such figures as Slate‘s tech columnist Farhad Manjoo, Business Insider editor-in-chief Henry Blodget, and a slew of other writers from places including the National Journal and Atlantic Wire.

Though most received the form response “@_____ learn more GE tax facts visit http://bit.ly/ea6Ay2″ followed by nuggets contradicting the Times story, like “GE paid almost $2.7 billion in cash taxes in 2010″ and “GE didn’t receive payment back from govt as a result of the tax benefit,” others, like the Business Insider main account were harangued to “Stop the misleading attacks.”

The GE public affairs account calls the Times story “inaccurate,” “erroneous,” and “grossly oversimplified.”

But some people GE has reached out to with an @ reply seem less than convinced. Carla Zilka tweeted, “I don’t know if NYT would print false facts re: GE, so someone is not being, ahem, “honest.”"

The dispute: what kind of taxes constitute that $2.7 billion GE claims to have paid? @khivi tweeted “@Gepublicaffairs tweets confirm @nytimes that GE paid $0 corporate tax,” to which GE responded “They are separate. Of $2.7B income tax paid, signf portion was US fed. GE also paid $1B+ in payroll, state & local use & property tax.”

Henry Blodget, in particular, has engaged in an interrogation of the account. After asking them whether the Times was wrong about GE’s $0 US tax bill, GE Public Affairs responded, “Well, GE paid U.S. $2.7B in cash taxes in 2010.”

At this point, he dragged the Times’ Bill Keller into the fight, tweeting, “If I’m not mistaken, GE has now said that the NYT story saying it paid no US taxes last year is flat-out wrong. @gepublicaffairs @nytkeller”

Interestingly enough, though, Blodget goes a step further than the official GE response, which, while calling the story “distorted and misleading,” skirts around actually saying the story is “wrong.”

Latest News

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • LinkedIn

{ Comments on this entry are closed }