Sunday, May 19, 2013

You are here: Home >

Posts tagged as:

record

Behind the headlines of record stock market highs this week is a more complex story of the inequality that characterizes the American economy.

Companies that sell discount goods to low-income buyers struggling with lean employment prospects, such as Walmart and Family Dollar, are racking up enormous sales, sending their stock prices higher as they enjoy success from distress.

Companies that sell luxury goods to the highest income households, such as the handbag maker Coach and the jeweler Tiffany & Co., also basking in lucrative times, reflecting how the wealthiest Americans are prospering with little thought of economic troubles.

But companies whose profits lean heavily on middle-income earners, like J.C. Penney and Sears, are stagnating, much like the American middle class itself.

The stock market is generally a poor proxy for the economy. Both, however, are characterized by extreme inequality, with large amounts of spending power concentrated at the extremes.

“Companies know and they’ve sort of noticed that the consumers in the middle are not doing so well,” said Chris Christopher, an economist at research firm IHS. “However, they’ve realized that the upper income brackets are doing fine. Then there’s people that are living paycheck to paycheck that are always looking for a good deal,”

As Christopher portrayed it, that has produced a “bifurcation” of the stock market, with companies harvesting profits by targeting customers at either end of the income spectrum. “Those companies that stick to the middle tier just suffer,” he said.

The Dow Jones Industrial Average on Wednesday finished at a record high of 14296.24, the second record in as many days. The index has doubled since early 2009, when the economy was gripped by financial panic.

But that recovery in share prices has been uneven. A look at the so-called retail sector, which includes some of the most recognizable store names in America, shows why.

Like many other publicly traded firms, chain store companies’ share prices have risen dramatically since 2009. The Dow Jones U.S. Retail Index, a barometer for the retail sector, is up 141 percent from its 2009 low.

But not all firms have benefited. Looking at share prices for JCPenney and Sears, which have barely risen since 2009, it would be hard to know that U.S. companies are reporting record profits and that the stock market is booming. Those two retail giants, which still cater to middle class Americans, are struggling with declining sales.

Meanwhile, dollar stores and no-frills retailers looking to attract to coupon-clippers have done well, as have as the luxury brand emporiums selling to those with cash to burn.

“With high unemployment and low income growth, companies are trying to squeeze money from wherever they can,” said Steven Keith Platt, director of Platt Retail Institute in Hinsdale, Ill., who performs research and consulting for clients in the retail trade.

“People with money have money even when the economy is lousy,” Platt said. “People like [luxury department store] Nordstrom are doing big investments in technology to get an even bigger percentage of those dollars. And the rest are just squeezed.”

Operators of discount chains like Family Dollar Stores and Dollar Tree Inc. have seen double-digit growth in sales since 2008. Share prices for those two companies have jumped nearly fourfold over the same period. Walmart, the world’s largest retailer and a magnet for cost-conscious customers, sold $ 469 billion worth of goods worldwide last year, 17 percent more than in 2008. That’s the equivalent of $ 1,494.55 from every man, woman and child in America.

At the same time, sales of luxury jewelry, perfumes, watches and handbags have skyrocketed, to the fortune of companies that sell those goods. Shareholders of Saks Inc. have seen gains of nearly 1,000 percent, as the company went from being unprofitable in 2008 and 2009 to earning $ 63 million last year. Tiffany and Co., the jewelry store chain, saw its sales rise more than 20 percent from 2008 to 2011 — the company has not yet reported financial data for all of 2012 — as its shares on the New York Stock Exchange have gone up fourfold. Luxury hangbag manufacturer Coach saw a 47 percent jump in sales from 2008 to 2011, as the company moved from presenting itself as an purveyor of “affordable luxury” to a more upscale brand. Those sales have accelerated since 2011.

“What I’ve heard from luxury retailers is that, after 2008, It wasn’t that their customers couldn’t afford to shop there. It was more of people holding back due to the perception that if other people couldn’t spend, maybe they should hold back, too,” said Nikki Baird, managing director of retail-focused RSR Research.

Now, those wealthy consumers are done with temporary vows of modesty. But “for other shoppers, the harsh reality is that even Walmart is too expensive for them,” Baird said. “Consumers are either extremely price-sensitive or extremely insulated.”

The trend, which economists and retail experts sometime refer to as a “barbell,” is only becoming more entrenched as the economy recovers.

“We saw the barbell intensify,” Kathryn Tesija, a merchandising executive at retailer Target told analysts during a conference call to discuss the company’s financial performance during the last quarter of 2012.

Tesija explained that Target’s profit over the season was split “between those early sales in Black Friday” by consumers seeking blockbuster deals “and then coming back strong at the end of the holiday,” when last-minute shoppers paid higher prices.

Tesija blamed “economic turmoil and the elections, and fiscal cliff, and all of that” for the divergence. But consumer attitudes could not be denied.

“It was a very competitive year this year,” Tesija said.

Latest News

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • LinkedIn

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

2012 Campaign Shatters Astonishing Record

by admin on December 6, 2012

WASHINGTON — The 2012 presidential election broke the $ 2 billion milestone in its final weeks, becoming the most expensive in American political history, according to final federal finance reports released Thursday. The reports detailed a last-minute cascade of money from mega-donors and an onslaught of spending by the Obama and Romney campaigns and “super” political action committees.

The final campaign finance tallies filed with the Federal Election Commission included nearly $ 86 million in fundraising for the losing presidential candidate, Republican Mitt Romney, in the election’s last weeks. That final burst brought the Romney campaign’s total for the election to above $ 1 billion. Final fundraising and spending totals for President Barack Obama’s victorious drive also topped $ 1 billion.

Surpassing the $ 2 billion mark was long expected after an election season dominated by the supercharged competitive pressures that both campaigns faced in mounting massive fundraising blitzes to stoke expensive media ad battles and ground wars. The Obama and Romney campaigns each mobilized competing squads of ultra-wealthy fundraisers, sought aid from free-spending allied super PACs and deployed multimillion-dollar media broadsides and armies of organizers.

The final thrust of fundraising included a massive late surge of $ 33 million in donations to pro-Romney political committees from a single billionaire, Las Vegas casino owner Sheldon Adelson. In all, Adelson and his wife, Miriam, gave Romney and other Republican candidates $ 95 million during the election season, closing in on the gambling magnate’s vow to give $ 100 million to GOP causes.

The new campaign finance filings covered the final few weeks of the race, when campaign organizations for Romney and Obama, along with a slew of super PACs, raised and spent millions toward the long-expected $ 2 billion milestone.

Despite Romney’s bitter election loss, his national finance chairman on Thursday declared a fundraising victory. Spencer Zwick said “every dollar we raised was put to use in the effort to elect Mitt Romney” and described the totals as “the most successful in Republican Party history.”

Both campaigns already were nearing $ 1 billion each in expenditures by late October, and super PACs supporting Obama and Romney had spent more than $ 500 million in media ads. Politically oriented nonprofit “social welfare” organizations that do not have to declare their finances or identify their fundraisers have spent hundreds of millions more on so-called issue ads.

The main pro-Romney super PAC, Restore Our Future, brought in $ 22 million in the campaign’s final weeks, finishing with $ 152 million for the entire campaign. Adelson and his wife provided $ 10 million of that last-minute total – as well as $ 23 million to American Crossroads, another pro-Romney super PAC headed by veteran GOP strategist Karl Rove. Other top late donors to Restore included Larry Ellison, head of software giant Oracle Corp., who gave $ 3 million, and Houston Texans owner Robert McNair, who gave $ 1 million. The Renco Group, a New York company headed by investor Ira Rennert, also gave $ 1 million.

The rival super PAC supporting Obama, Priorities USA Action, reported raising $ 15 million during the last weeks of the campaign. The group was run by a group of former White House aides. The committee’s final haul accounted for about 20 percent of roughly $ 78 million in contributions this election cycle.

The group’s top donors included Renaissance Technologies investors James H. Simons and Henry Laufer, who each gave $ 1.5 million. Chicago media mogul Fred Eychaner, Texas lawyer Steve Mostyn, and Stephen Robert, also of Renaissance, also gave $ 1 million, as did the Laborer’s International Union of North America.

But Adelson was the election’s single most influential donor, vowing he would give more than $ 100 million to GOP candidates by the election. His postelection super PAC total does not quite match that figure, but the casino magnate also hinted broadly he would also give millions more to GOP-leaning nonprofits that do not have to report their war chests to the FEC but instead provide confidential figures to the Internal Revenue Service.

Along with his dominant presence in the presidential race, Adelson also poured money into super PACs backing several GOP Senate candidates in the final weeks of the election. More than $ 1.5 million in Adelson money went to a super PAC backing GOP candidate George Allen in Virginia, $ 1 million to a committee aiding Michigan candidate Peter Hoekstra and $ 500,000 to a super PAC supporting Sen. Scott Brown. All were defeated.

Adelson recently told The Wall Street Journal that he would double his $ 100 million investment in GOP causes by the next election and he has the financial muscle to do it. His massive campaign donations are backed by his lucrative casino holdings in the U.S. and Macau. The most recent November quarterly statement of his Las Vegas Sands Corp. estimated that Adelson’s casino revenues surged $ 1.11 billion in the first nine months of 2012 compared with the same period in 2011.

In late November, Adelson’s company announced a special dividend of $ 2.75 a share in anticipation of the threatened “fiscal cliff” rise in federal tax rates. The dividend move netted Adelson – who owns more than half of Sands’ 820 million shares – an estimated personal gain of as much as $ 1.2 billion, according to financial analysts.

Adelson’s role as the premiere fundraiser in American politics could be complicated by his casino company’s continuing struggles with the federal government over tax revenues and Justice Department and Securities and Exchange Commission investigations focusing on possible violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, which targets money-laundering and international bribery.

Sands’ recent quarterly statement acknowledged the federal probes as well as negotiations with the IRS over “unrecognized tax benefits” highlighted by a tax audit of the company’s Macao and Singapore casino earnings between 2005 and 2009.

Sands cited a “possible settlement of matters presently under consideration at appeals in connection with the IRS audit.”

___

Follow Jack Gillum on Twitter at http://twitter.com/jackgillum

Latest News

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • LinkedIn

{ Comments on this entry are closed }