Saturday, May 25, 2013

You are here: Home >

Posts tagged as:

iowa

Mitt Romney is tired of hearing about the change made to his book that touts Massachusetts’ CommonWealth Care as a “model for the nation.” But Rick Perry keeps bringing it up. So Romney proposed a $ 10,000 wager — perhaps unprecedented in presidential debates, although we’ll wait for Gingrich to provide the historical background.

Romney asked the Texas governor if he’d wager $ 10,000 to settle a dispute over his healthcare record and where he stood on the individual mandate.

“I’m just saying, you’re for individual mandates, my friend,” Perry said to Romney.

“You’ve raised that before, Rick, and you’re simply wrong,” Romney responded, extending his hand toward Perry. “Rick, I’ll tell you what: 10,000 bucks?”

Sadly, Perry didn’t want to take the bet, so we never got to learn what the terms were exactly. Instead, Romney quoted from the chapter in which he said that every state should have the opportunity to make its own health care plan.

My colleague Ryan Grim quips: “How many people have you met who casually make $ 10,000 bets?” It’s pretty “1 percent,” if you ask me.

To put the amount in perspective, according to a tweet from West Wing Report, “The $ 10K bet Romney offered to make represents three months pay for most Americans.”

Conservatives didn’t hold back on jokes directed at the wealthy Romney. Jonah Goldberg of the National Review tweeted that “Romney promises that his butler will ‘personally deliver’ $ 10,000 check if he loses,” which was quickly retweeted by RedState’s Erick Erickson.

Jonathan Martin, who covers the GOP race for Politico, also pounced. “Who among us doesn’t wager $ 10K at a time?” he tweeted.

People on both sides of the aisle took to Twitter after Romney made the bet, with many claiming Romney had given Democrats another opportunity to hit on his personal fortune.

More historical debate gaffes:




Most Popular Entries on HuffingtonPost

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • LinkedIn

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

A new web video comes as evidence the hacker group Anonymous is getting involved in the 2012 election.

The Des Moines Register reports that Anonymous has claimed responsibility for a clip encouraging viewers to disrupt January’s Iowa caucuses. The Hawkeye State-based outlet notes that local authorities are not taking the news lightly.

The two-minute YouTube video is narrated by a synthetic-sounding voice leveling a charge that both Democrats and Republicans have “failed us” — citing ties to megacorporations as a key factor. Taking the argument a step further, the video alleges that both parties are guilty of deliberately driving tens of millions of people into poverty.

“Voting for these parties is unethical,” the voice says. “They have destroyed the American democracy.”

The clip reveals details of a planned caucus shutdown, beginning two days after Christmas.

“We are calling upon you to occupy the campaign offices of presidential headquarters in Des Moines, Iowa on December 27th, and peacefully shut down the first-in-the-nation Iowa caucuses on January 3,” the voice says.

CNN reported last week that Occupy Wall Street activists have plans in the works to take their message to Iowa one week before the state’s caucuses.

Despite the call to “occupy” from Anonymous, the Register reports that members of Occupy Des Moines say there is no connection between the groups.

In recent months, Anonymous has taken on a host of causes outside of politics. From threatening to kill Facebook over privacy issues, to taking on the prominent Zetas drug cartel, to revealing IP addresses of child porn viewers, the group has made a name for itself with these types of online operations.

Latest News

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • LinkedIn

{ Comments on this entry are closed }