Saturday, May 18, 2013

You are here: Home >

Posts tagged as:

benefit

Arkansas is poised to move ahead with a plan to expand Medicaid to more poor people under President Barack Obama’s health care reform law after key votes by the Republican-led legislature Wednesday.

The Arkansas Senate approved funding for the Medicaid expansion with a more than three-fourths majority following the House passing it with a similar margin Tuesday. Tweaks to a separate measure authorizing the expansion hadn’t passed either chamber Wednesday night, but the level of support indicates it will prevail. After final votes Wednesday or Thursday, the legislation will go to Gov. Mike Beebe (D), who supports the bill. Beebe negotiated with the Obama administration on the proposal and has secured tentative approval from U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius to put it into action.

Arkansas’ acceptance of the Medicaid expansion is notable because the state spearheaded efforts to pair broadening of the program with privatizing it and delivering health benefits to poor residents through private health plans on Obamacare’s health insurance exchanges. Ohio, Florida and other states dominated by GOP politicians are weighing similar plans after rejecting a straight expansion of the traditional government-run Medicaid program.

Federal approval of the Arkansas plan may spur action in states otherwise hostile to Obama’s health care law, which would boost the number of poor people who gain access to health benefits starting next year. When the Supreme Court upheld the health law in June, it granted states the option to bow out of the Medicaid expansion, prompting Republican governors like Texas’ Rick Perry and Louisiana’s Bobby Jindal to refuse to open the program to more people.

To date, the chief executives of 26 states and the District of Columbia support the Medicaid expansion, including the Republican governors of Arizona, Florida, Michigan, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, North Dakota and Ohio. Republican governors in 19 states oppose the expansion.

Obama’s health care law seeks to expand Medicaid to anyone earning up to 133 percent of the federal poverty level, which is $ 15,282 for a single person this year. The federal government will pay the full cost of enrolling these newly eligible people from 2014 through 2016, after which the share would gradually decline until it reaches 90 percent in 2022 and future years.

Governors like Beebe, Arizona’s Jan Brewer (R), Ohio’s John Kasich (R) and Florida’s Rick Scott (R) urged their Republican-led legislatures to accept the expansion — and the huge influx of federal dollars that come with it. Refusing the expansion not only would deprive poor residents of health coverage, but would subject the entire state to federal income taxes to finance Medicaid coverage in other states without benefiting their neighbors, theses governors contend.

But confronted with continuing staunch opposition to Obamacare itself, Beebe and others sought a middle ground by using the health care reform funding to provide private health insurance instead of Medicaid benefits.

The Obama administration has encouraged states to consider this approach as a means to maximize the expansion of health coverage under health care reform. Marilyn Tavenner, the acting administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, said she doesn’t expect many states to enact privatized Medicaid expansions, however.

The administration’s efforts to be flexible haven’t been enough to satisfy some Republicans, including Tennessee Gov. Bill Haslam, who said last month he wouldn’t support the Medicaid expansion without additional permission from the federal government to make changes to the program itself, such as requiring beneficiaries to pay more.

The plans in Arkansas and other states would give Medicaid-eligible people access to the law’s new health insurance exchanges alongside those with higher incomes. These online marketplaces for small businesses and individuals who buy their own coverage will be enable comparison shopping and access to financial assistance. Via these exchanges, individuals who earn between the federal poverty level, which is $ 11,490 for a single person this year, and four times that amount can qualify for tax credits to help pay for coverage.

Proponents of what’s known as the private option for Medicaid in Arkansas contend that health insurance companies can deliver more coordinated medical care than traditional Medicaid and that low-income people whose earnings can rise and fall would benefit from remaining with the same private health plan rather than switching between Medicaid and the health insurance exchanges. Skeptics noted that private insurance typically is costlier than Medicaid on a per-person basis.

The Arkansas legislature is just the second GOP-led state body to pass a bill to expand Medicaid under Obamacare, joining North Dakota, where Gov. Jack Dalrymple (R) signed the measure Tuesday. Majority-Republican legislatures in Ohio, Florida, Michigan, Missouri and elsewhere so far have stymied expansions support by their governors.

John Celock contributed to this article

Latest News

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • LinkedIn

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

SAN FRANCISCO — On March 2, online review site Yelp will become the next major San Francisco-based tech firm to take advantage of a newly instituted payroll tax break designed to keep innovative, young companies within the city limits instead of fleeing for Silicon Valley’s comparatively inexpensive pastures.

However, there’s a possibility that, despite its purported tax cutting, business-growing benefits, the controversial payroll tax break given to San Francisco companies undergoing their IPOs won’t save Yelp a single penny.

Unlike every other city in California, San Francisco raises a significant portion of its revenue from a tax on large businesses (meaning those with annual payrolls greater than a quarter of a million dollars) equal to one and half percent of the total compensation paid out to all their employees. Compensation here is defined as regular salaries, bonuses and–since 2004–exercised stock options.

The inclusion of stock options into the city’s payroll tax structure wasn’t much of an issue because, in the wake of the dot com bust, there weren’t a whole lot of local companies looking make waves with large-scale IPOs.

All of that changed in the last few years, as a swarm of social media-fueled tech firms have looked to take the public plunge.

When micro-blogging phenomenon Twitter outgrew its space in the trendy South of Market neighborhood, the company took the opportunity to reconsider its need to be in San Francisco in light of the millions it would likely be forced to shell out to the city during its eventual IPO.

While Twitter’s individual tax problem was solved when it was given a spot inside the mid-Market redevelopment zone, in which the payroll taxes of all companies are frozen at their current rates, the company’s ultimately-aborted flight drew the attention of city leaders. Such officials worried that heavily taxing IPOs would put the new tech revival, one increasingly centered within San Francisco’s trendy urban core rather than Silicon Valley’s endless canopy of office parks, at risk.

As a result, the Board of Supervisors passed an ordinance last May limiting the total amount any company going though an IPO would have to pay in payroll taxes on stock-based compensation at either $ 750,000 or what the firm paid in 2010–whichever is greater.

This partial holiday from the city’s payroll tax lasts though 2017, which, according to the text of the law, will allow enough time for a comprehensive review of how the San Francisco’s tax code applies to local businesses.

According to a report by the San Francisco Examiner, online gaming powerhouse Zynga used the tax break to avoid paying up to $ 6 million to the city on its more than $ 1 billion IPO last December.

Despite a history of controversy, Yelp is widely seen as one of the leading lights of the new tech boom. And its IPO, while nowhere near the size of Zynga’s massive haul, is expected to rake in around $ 115 million for the company before expenses.

In light of the city’s substantial budget hole, the decision to leave what amounts to a very large pile of money sitting on the table, at least in the short term, has led some to question the value of so strongly incentivizing tech companies to stay in San Francisco–especially since many plan to remain here regardless.

“It rarely happens that a company starts looking at SF, decides it’s too expensive and moves out to Walnut Creek,” Brady Barbier, associate managing director of Integra Realty Resources, the largest independent commercial real estate valuation and consulting firm in North America, told The Huffington Post.

Even so, the tax break would only affect the largest IPOs, leaving the vast majority–possibly even Yelp’s–totally unaffected. According to a report issued by the city’s Office of Economic Analysis, of the 14 San Francisco companies that went public between last May and 1997, not a single one of them would have triggered the $ 750,000 cap on payroll taxes.

The city’s average haul from a single IPO during that time period was a mere $ 140,000.

Not even the mighty Salesforce.com (aka the company that ate San Francisco) would have qualified for any savings under the current payroll tax structure.

Even so, Yelp spokesperson Vince Sollitto told The Wall Street Journal‘s Market Watch that while the company didn’t go out and lobby city officials to make the change, Yelp is happy that it happened:

“Yelp is a frequent visit stop for candidates for city office. When they ask about the benefits and challenges of founding and growing a company in San Francisco, we are always sure to mention to them that the payroll tax is a powerful disincentive to hiring,” Sollitto said.

Sollitto added that the issue “was certainly one of the reasons it was more economical for us to expand in Phoenix, where we opened an office last year that now has over 200 employees in it.”

Yelp declined to discuss any specifics about the IPO due to legal restrictions involving the “quiet period” between the filing of its S-1 form with the SEC and the actual IPO date.

Yelp expects to sell just over seven million shares, at somewhere between $ 12 and $ 14 per share.

Check out this video showing how to use Yelp to find a local restaurant:

Latest News

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • LinkedIn

{ Comments on this entry are closed }